“Is the science behind this real?”
The underlying technology is documented, defensible, and reproducible by a third party. A reviewer can read the methodology, replicate the scoring calculation, and audit the question bank integrity without trusting our infrastructure.
Three independently verifiable artifacts ground the technology claim: the IEEE-format paper carries the methodology, the Cohen's d analysis defends the statistical claims, and the Ethereum-mainnet anchor (block 24,467,724) makes the question bank tamper-evident. Eleven provisional patents document the novel contributions.
Responsible AI Horizons: A Multi-Dimensional Framework V4.0 — IEEE copyright, peer-reviewable
public/marketing/Responsible_AI_Horizons*.pdf
The four-dimensional moral space encoded in lib/scoring/, with documented reasoning for each axis
lib/scoring/ + docs/specs/SPEC-scoring-unification-graduated-personality-v1.0.md
Effect-size analysis defending the discriminative validity of the framework against random chance
Section in IEEE paper
Question Bank Registry contract on Base L2; schema integrity hash anchored to Ethereum mainnet block 24,467,724
contracts/QuestionBankRegistry.sol + /verify/:id
Eleven provisional patents across four filings, covering the framework, the methodology, and the runtime monitoring approach
/investors and /docs/patents
Multiple SPEC documents tracked in STATUS-INDEX, deployed to production, version-controlled
docs/specs/SPEC-patent-*-v1.0.md
The technology can be demonstrated as a working artifact, not just a paper. This criterion is met — see Level 2: Product Build.